Blur can be applied at the capture stage in portrait mode, but it can be added manually to any photo in the editor afterwards, with control over how strong the blur is. If I want to improve the look especially for portraits, I apply blur (see the gallery above for the different eraser and blur approaches to the same image). And if I’m seeking authenticity and aesthetic pleasure in a single picture, I personally lean on the Blur tool way more regularly. Its Content-Aware Fill tool can get overwhelmed by cluttered backgrounds and render artifact-ridden patches instead. Magic Eraser works amazingly well for simple surroundings, like silhouettes against a clear sky, and can be a great tool, but in 2023 it’s a long way from perfect. Erasing those smartphone picture imperfections has never been the answer for me – I choose another tool instead. But I’ve never got on with the Magic Eraser. ![]() I often add a little gloss in the editor. ![]() So surely Magic Eraser is a good thing?ĭon’t get me wrong – I want to make authentic pictures that also catch the eye, especially lovely portraits of my kids. And even given those luxuries, photo failures can happen, even to the best photographers. Most authentic moments happen in a flash, when you don’t have the luxury of composing the shot perfectly, shifting your angle so the background looks better, or getting that second chance to catch the moment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |